Policy
North America More Crucial Than Iran In Balancing Oil Trade
more...


Indiaís US Crude Oil Purchase Strategy Faulty?
more...


Bungled In Past Contracts, PLL wants A Sensible Deal In US
more...


Integrated Oil Behemoth Still A Distant Dream
more...


Political And Economic Impact Of Declining Oil price
more...

Regulation
OVL Advised To Source Deals In A More Proactive Way
more...


Despite Drop In Consumption, LPG Demand To Surge
more...


Euro VI Introduction May Prompt Long Refinery Shutdowns
more...


Swan Energyís Floating LNG Project In Trouble
more...

Alternative Energy / Fuel
Additional Soft Loan For Ethanol Production
more...

New Projects
HPCL, Rajasthan Awards Contract To McDermott
more...


Reliance, BP Get Key Ship On KG-D6 For Expediting Gas Output
more...

Market Watch
Modi Govt.ís Flagship Scheme Ujjwala Hits 60-Million Mark
more...

Companies
Deep Industries Ltd
more...


IOT Infra Plans To Manufacture Bio-CNG In Tamil Nadu
more...


Selanís Share Buyback Plan
more...


Confidence Petroleum Gets License For 11 More Auto LPG Stations
more...

Press Release [FREE Access]
Petro Intelligence Ľ Why And How Bastia Got Busted

Mukesh AmbaniRabi Narayan Bastia, head of exploration at Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), has quit the company without assigning any reason.

The sudden resignation has sent a buzz of speculation through the small cloister of petroleum industry mavens because Bastia is the geologist who has been credited with identifying the 'huge' potential reserves of the D6 field in the Krishna Godavari basin.

The obvious question: did his resignation have anything to do with the recent troubles that have enveloped the field just over a year ago after gas output started to dip to alarming levels?

Rabi BastiaBastia is a distinguished geologist with an impressive track record. He holds a PhD in structural geology from IIT Kharagpur and is a pretty well-known figure in the world’s geo-scientific academia.

D6 was billed as the biggest gas discovery in the world in 2002. It was projected to produce 80 mmscmd of gas in 2011-12. When production soared to 60 mmscmd in July 2009, it was a rah-rah moment for Reliance – and it was reckoned to be well on course to attain a peak production of 80 mmscmd. But things started to go wrong soon after and gas production plummeted. Output is now slated to fall to 20 mmscmd in 2014-15.

P.M.S PrasadIn short, KG-D6 has all the makings of a colossal disaster. A couple of months ago we irreverently compared the disaster in the Bay of Bengal with John F. Kennedy’s notorious Bay of Pigs disaster. We didn’t know then the magnitude of the disaster and were unaware that what we had said in jest had a sickening ring of truth.

A number of reasons have been attributed for the KG-D6 debacle (click column policy to read D6 Imbroglio: Take The Nation Into Confidence). We started our investigation into the D6 catastrophe sometime ago and our report quoted BP – which was roped in as RIL’s strategic partner last year – as saying that the D1, D3 fields did not hold the sort of prospects that it was touted to possess.

We delved a little deeper and we now have a fair idea of what went wrong. But we do not consider ourselves competent to sit in judgment on the issue and would not like to indulge in loose prattle. We are just doing our professional duty of probing an issue that is of tremendous national importance.

V.K SibalOur inquiries reveal that as chief of exploration, Bastia will have to own up responsibility for the D6 disaster. Bastia cannot be blamed for either the complexities or unpredictability of the KG basin. That is Nature’s creation. The question is: did Bastia go wrong in evaluating the reserves of the D6 block?

Experts acknowledge that the definitions of reserves and associated guidelines cannot address all possible scenarios. Nor can they remove the conditions of uncertainty that are inherent in all reserves estimates. It is the responsibility of the reserves evaluator to exercise sound professional judgement and apply these guidelines appropriately and objectively.

Shashi MukundanBastia does not seem to have done that. He is considered a genuine professional incapable of perpetuating such a fraud. The question is: Where did he falter?

It appears that some geological parameters that determine how much hydrocarbons the sub-surface holds have only been studied over a small area and the data has been extrapolated to cover the entire area. The study was confined to a pilot area. The assumption was that the same geological parameters would exist in the rest of the field, which was not true. Why was this extrapolation permitted?

US multinationals sell mathematical modelling software that just takes data from one well and applies it to a vast area based purely on statistical theory rather than predicated on the actual geology of the area.

Using data drawn from just a few wells, the software can draw up a model showing the rock formations that lie deep below even though the facts may not corroborate the theoretical model. The well log data itself is an indirect measurement of geological parameters that decide the accumulation of hydrocarbons.

 For example, there is the Gamma Ray measurement which is determined by using a probe. If the gamma ray is lower, it is assumed that the rocks such as limestone and sand stone exist which are likely candidates for holding hydrocarbons. The process called inversion is to use all these indirect parameters to recreate what the Earth looks like deep below and where it holds eagerly sought hydrocarbons. The modelling based on mathematical software is designed to trim costs and cut the time to determine reserves for exploration. But the downside risk is that the compulsions of time and money can result in blunders.

But not many are aware of what the software actually does and for convenience-sake rely on it which results in blunders like D6.

The Russian petrophysicists are aware of the pitfalls of the software and, hence, do not use it to draw a model of the sub surface. Not many geoscientists know how these mathematical tools work. For example, wrong conclusions can be drawn by certain log indirect measurements which overestimate the pore volumes and lead to bloated reserves.

Rabi Bastia appears to have relied too much on these western mathematical software. There is understood to be a massive variance in the reserve estimates in D6 now that the model has been rebuilt on the basis of actual observed parameters.

 



To download the latest issue 'Volume 25 Issue 19 - January 10, 2019', click here
Petro Intelligence [FREE Access]
Clash Of Egos Bedevil Mega Refinery Project
more...

Saudi Tweet Stokes A Storm Of Speculation
more...

RILís Pre-emptive Surgical Strike?
more...

One-Buck Dilemma For Private Fuel Retailers
more...

Foreign Investment
Oilex Cambay JV Receives Payment From Partner
more...


Iran May Invest In Chennai Petroleum Expansion
more...

Overseas Investment
OVL Discovers Oil In Colombia
more...

Gas Scene
Update: PNG Connections
more...


LNG Import Projection By Industry Group
more...


Status Of Gas Pipelines Under Construction
more...


Trends In Domestic Natural Gas Price & International Bench Marks
more...


Capacity Utilization of LNG Regasification Terminals
more...


Domestic Gas Scene In November 2018
more...


Story Of Two LNG Terminals Of Petronet LNG Ltd
more...


CNG Growth Over The Years & CNG Sales as on 1st April, 2018
more...


LNG Terminals in India
more...


CGD Factsheet As Of Sept 2018
more...


A total picture about Natural Gas scene including CBM in India
more...


State-Wise Share In CGD Business
more...


Update: Sectoral Consumption of Natural Gas, LNG Import and Total Net Available Gas for Sale
more...


Declining Rate Of Gas Flaring In ONGCís Fields
more...


Natural Gas In Indiaís Energy Basket
more...

Data Section
Monthly Upstream Data
Monthly Downstream Data
Historical database
Data Archives
Special Database
Major End use of petroleum products in India
more...


Fuel & Loss In Indian Refineries: An Update
more...


Update: Distillate Yield of PSU refineries
more...


Bharat Petroleum Corporationís Impressive Refining Coverage
more...


Update: High Sulphur (HS) & Low Sulphur (LS) crude oil processing
more...


Power deficit: Region-wise position for November 2018
more...


India Imports Less Petroleum Products In November 2018
more...


Crude Oil Import From OPEC Goes Up In April- November 2018
more...


OILís In-House Capabilities & Infrastructure to support E&P Activities
more...


Weightage of crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products in Wholesale Price Index (WPI)
more...


Indiaís Shrinking Exportable Surplus Of Petroleum Products
more...


BPCLís Global Upstream Footprint
more...


Update: Status of blocks under NELP as on 1st November 2018
more...


Production Of Petroleum Products From Natural Gas / Fractionators
more...


Imported Crude & Domestic Crude Oil Processing
more...


Capacity Utilisation of Crude Oil Pipelines of IOC, OIL, Cairn, BORL, HMEL
more...


Declining Capacity Utilization of ONGCís Crude Oil Pipelines
more...


FOB Price Of Indian Basket Of Crude Oil
more...

Tenders [FREE Access]
ONGC
more...


ONGC
more...